How did the romans beat the greeks- legions vs phalanx, gladius vs sarissa the roman empire emerged with the end of the republic and the dictatorship of augustus caesar 721 years of roman. Organisation greek phalanx the development of the early legion may be seen as a roman version of the greek phalanx formationuntil the 4th century bc the massive greek phalanx was the mode of battle.
Short answer: the roman legion the greek hoplite phalanx (which was never made up of peasants, since the hoplites provided their own equipment) was the most advanced military formation of its time up until the battle of chaeronea (338 bc) or so,. The greek phalanx and the roman legion were two of the most revolutionary war tactics created in the ancient warfare era the greek phalanx and the roman legion both brought new and more efficient ways of defeating ones enemy by incorporating genius tactical formations.
Roman infantry tactics refers to the theoretical and historical deployment, phalanxes facing the legion were vulnerable to the more flexible roman checkerboard deployment, which provided each fighting man a good chunk of personal space to engage in close order fighting the greek king pyrrhus' phalangical system was to prove a tough. Roman legion vs greek phalanx after learning more about both of the formations (legions for rome and phalanxes for greece) it got me wondering on which one would win i obviously know that the romans conquered the greeks but suppose it was a straight fight.
A roman legion was more flexible, because it had manacles that could split up and form shapes to trap the enemy the phalanx was a big square of destruction find evidence to support the idea that the romans were open to the influence of foreign cultures.
In that case, yes, i do believe a greek army, built on the backs of a phalanx, could consistently beat the roman legion in essentially any scenario however, it would require a restructuring of the entire army.
Legion vs phalanx: which powerhouse formation was better a discussion on the differences and opposing merits of the greek phalanx vs the roman legion the organization from homeric style hero warfare to tightly packed hoplite warfare was world changing this powerful greek formation allowed the greeks to hold off the powerful persian invasion and spread greek culture throughout the. Roman infantry tactics refers to the theoretical and historical deployment, see roman military personal equipment and roman legion for more information on equipment, individual legions and structure equipment compared to the tightly packed spearmen of the phalanx, the roman heavy infantry, through their training and discipline, and. Greek phalanx vs roman legion: a history of the most powerful military formations in the ancient world jul, 28 2017 author: thema newsroom both formations the foundations of western warfare.
The strength of the greek phalanx lay in the endurance and discipline of the soldiers who made up the closely-packed rectangular formation of shields and spears using it to effect during the period of the roman republic before the formation was discarded in favor of the three-line roman legion with which the roman empire conquered the. Wab macedonian phalanx vs roman legion by jeff jonas peter connolly captures the action as the phalanx pins and pushes back the romans on the level ground.
The ancient greek historian polybius goes into some detail about the effectiveness of the roman legion against the phalanx he deduces that the romans refused to fight the phalanx where the phalanx was most effective and offered battle only when they felt that they could exploit the clumsiness and immobility of the phalanx. Legion vs phalanx: two powerhouse formations of ancient warfare ancient history instant articles the roman manipular legion and the macedonian phalanx were each pivotal factors in the successes of their states, but was one formation actually better than the other a greek phalanx charging into battle, as peltasts throw spears over.